Removal of Iron (II) ions from wastewater using Black, Green and White Tea waste
dc.contributor.author | Karambizi Gihozo, Kellia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-16T14:27:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-05-16T14:27:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-16 | |
dc.description | 54 pages; illustrations | en_US |
dc.description | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 39-41). | |
dc.description.abstract | Due to their toxicity, heavy metal ion like Fe2+ are a category of contaminants that should be avoided in the aquatic environment. The necessity to develop a low-cost, efficient technology for removing heavy metals from water is inescapable. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the adsorption efficiency and capacity of black, green and white Twinings tea waste in removing Fe2+(aq). The impact of changing several factors such as the starting concentration of Fe2+ in solution, the physical texture of the adsorbent used, and the contact duration was studied. Solutions were made in two categories: sonicated and non-sonicated. Each category had a set of both fine and regular tea leaves. Both sonicated and non-sonicated samples were made with increasing amounts of Fe2+(aq). All solutions were treated with 0.025 g of tea waste for 90 minutes. Both sonicated regular and fine black tea samples showed a high adsorption efficiency of 100% while the non-sonicated samples varied with 72.4% as the highest efficiency. Sonicated tea samples yielded a higher adsorption capacity of 4.5 mg/g compared to 3.5 mg/g of non-sonicated tea samples. Based on these calculated adsorption efficiencies and capacities, the experiment demonstrated that sonicated tea samples are the most effective at removing iron contamination in water. This study also showed black tea to be most efficient compared to green and white tea. However, further research is necessary to determine the most efficient tea between green and white tea. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ABSTRACT -- INTRODUCTION -- 1.1. Heavy Metal Water Pollution -- 1.2. Iron (II) (Fe2+) in Water -- 1.3. Tea and Tea Waste Composition -- 1.4. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE): Complex Formation -- 1.5. Previous Methods -- 1.6. Goals of the Study -- 1.7. Hypotheses -- 2. PROCEDURES -- 2.1. COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURES -- 2.2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES -- 2.2.1. MATERIALS -- 2.2.2. INSTRUMENTATION -- 2.2.3 METHODS -- A. Sample Preparation -- B. UV-Vis Absorption Spectroscopy -- C. Vibrational Spectroscopy -- 3. RESULTS & DISCUSSION -- 3.1. MOE Calculations -- 3.2. UV-Vis Absorption Spectroscopy -- 3.3. Beer’s plot -- 3.4. Vibrational Spectroscopy -- 3.5. Adsorption efficiency (%) -- 4.6. Adsorption Capacity (mg/g) -- 3.7. Rwandan Black Tea -- 4. CONCLUSIONS -- 4.1. LIMITATIONS -- 4.2. FUTURE WORK -- 5. REFERENCES -- 5.1. APPENDICES | |
dc.identifier.citation | Karambizi Gihozo, Kellia (2022, May 16), Removal of Iron (II) ions from wastewater using black, green and white tea waste. Retrieve from: | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://digitalrepository.wheatoncollege.edu/handle/11040/32532 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wheaton College. (Norton, Mass.) | |
dc.subject | Undergraduate research. | |
dc.subject | Undergraduate thesis. | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Sewage—Purification—Heavy metals removal | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Water—Pollution | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Ultraviolet-visible action spectroscopy | |
dc.title | Removal of Iron (II) ions from wastewater using Black, Green and White Tea waste | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
- Name:
- thesis kellia_repository copy.pdf
- Size:
- 10.59 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
Loading...
- Name:
- Thesis Abstract.pdf
- Size:
- 67.19 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
Loading...
- Name:
- 2022_HonorsThesisPermissionsForm_Kellia Karambizi.pdf
- Size:
- 258.73 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.63 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: