Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Motivational Interviewing for Use in Rural Nepal.

dc.contributor.authorRimal, Pragya
dc.contributor.authorKhadka, Sonu
dc.contributor.authorBogati, Bhawna
dc.contributor.authorChaudhury, Jamuna
dc.contributor.authorKumari Rawat, Laxmi
dc.contributor.authorChhaya Bhat, Kumari
dc.contributor.authorManandhar, Pramita
dc.contributor.authorCitrin, David
dc.contributor.authorMaru, Duncan
dc.contributor.authorEkstrand, Maria L.
dc.contributor.authorBahadur Swar, Sikhar
dc.contributor.authorAryal, Anu
dc.contributor.authorKohrt, Brandon
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Srijana
dc.contributor.authorAcharya, Bibhav
dc.description9 pages.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Motivational Interviewing (MI) has a robust evidence base in facilitating behavior change for several health conditions. MI focuses on the individual and assumes patient autonomy. Cross-cultural adaptation can face several challenges in settings where individualism and autonomy may not be as prominent. Sociocultural factors such as gender, class, caste hinder individual decision-making. Key informant perspectives are an essential aspect of crosscultural adaptation of new interventions. Here, we share our experience of translating and adapting MI concepts to the local language and culture in rural Nepal, where families and communities play a central role in infuencing a person’s behaviors. // Methods: We developed, translated, feld-tested, and adapted a Nepali MI training module with key informants to generate insights on adapting MI for the frst time in this cultural setting. Key informants were fve Nepali nurses who supervise community health workers. We used structured observation notes to describe challenges and experiences in cross-cultural adaptation. We conducted this study as part of a larger study on using MI to improve adherence to HIV treatment. // Results: Participants viewed MI as an efective intervention with the potential to assist patients poorly engaged in care. Regarding patient autonomy, they initially shared examples of family members unsuccessfully dictating patient behavior change. These discussions led to consensus that every time the family members restrict patient’s autonomy, the patient complies temporarily but then resumes their unhealthy behavior. In addition, participants highlighted that even when a patient is motivated to change (e.g., return for follow-up), their family members may not “allow” it. Discussion led to suggestions that health workers may need to conduct MI separately with patients and family members to understand everyone’s motivations and align those with the patient’s needs. // Conclusions: MI carries several cultural assumptions, particularly around individual freedom and autonomy. MI adaptation thus faces challenges in cultures where such assumptions may not hold. However, cross-cultural adaptation with key informant perspectives can lead to creative strategies that recognize both the patient’s autonomy and their role as a member of a complex social fabric to facilitate behavior change. // Keywords: LMICs, Motivational Interviewing, Nepal, Cultural adaptation, Global Mental Healthen_US
dc.identifier.citationRimal, Pragya, et al. “Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Motivational Interviewing for Use in Rural Nepal.” Wheaton College Digital Repository, BMC Psychology, 1 Apr. 2021,
dc.publisherBMC Psychologyen_US
dc.titleCross-Cultural Adaptation of Motivational Interviewing for Use in Rural Nepal.
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
949.46 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format